Last updated: Wednesday, 08-Oct-2025 10:23:18 EDT
ID | MIDTERM1 | PercentGrade |
---|---|---|
xxx0697 | 101 | 100 |
xxx1092 | 97 | 97 |
xxx1323 | 77 | 77 |
xxx1623 | 101 | 100 |
xxx2158 | 99 | 99 |
xxx3121 | 87 | 87 |
xxx3134 | 100 | 100 |
xxx3139 | 110 | 100 |
xxx3140 | missing | 0 |
xxx3813 | 97 | 97 |
xxx4030 | 100 | 100 |
xxx4139 | 97 | 97 |
xxx4560 | 100 | 100 |
xxx5202 | 101 | 100 |
xxx5756 | 100 | 100 |
xxx7194 | 101 | 100 |
xxx7706 | 101 | 100 |
xxx7998 | missing | 0 |
xxx8061 | 95 | 95 |
xxx9317 | 1 | 1 |
xxx9327 | 99 | 99 |
xxx9479 | 98 | 98 |
xxx9578 | 100 | 100 |
xxx9879 | 98 | 98 |
Last updated: Tuesday, 23-Sep-2025 16:37:45 EDT
Etiam porta sem malesuada magna mollis euismod rendered as bold text. Cras mattis consectetur purus sit amet fermentum le syndrome du clandestin. A clear, authoritative judicial holding on the meaning of a particular
\[ \begin{align} \nabla \times \vec{E} & = -\frac{\partial\vec{B}}{\partial t} \\ \nabla \cdot \vec{D} & = \rho_f \\ \nabla \times \vec{H} & = \vec{J}_f + \frac{\partial\vec{D}}{\partial t}\\ \nabla \cdot \vec{B} & = 0 \end{align} \]provision should not be cast in doubt and subjected to challenge whenever a related though not utterly inconsistent provision is adopted in the same statute or even in an affiliated statute, the two authors wrote